<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>All about RAID-5  glued for you by GlueText.com on August 25, 2009 at 23:29 EST</title>
<description>All about RAID-5,  glued for you by GlueText.com on August 25, 2009 at 23:29 EST </description>
<link>http://www-r.gluetext.com/content/r/RAID-5/RAID-5.html</link>
<item>
<title>Glued for you by GlueText.com</title>
<description>Search for 
RAID-5  or anything else at GlueText.com</description>
<link>http://www.gluetext.com/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gluetext.com/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>This page in HTML about 
RAID-5  glued for you by GlueText.com</title>
<description>Read these articles about RAID-5  and more... All glued for you by GlueText.com</description>
<link>http://www-r.gluetext.com/content/r/RAID-5/RAID-5.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www-r.gluetext.com/content/r/RAID-5/RAID-5.html</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buffalo's New NAS    RAID-5    Box is iPhone Compatible Too - buffalo NAS - Gizmodo</title>
<description><![CDATA[MacGyver Chef: Poached Chicken and Couscous in a Coffee Maker Wireless Ebook Readers: Which One'll Burn Down the Bookstore? PlayStation 3 Slim Review: The Same For Less Taste Test: Technology's Transformation of Food Alton Brown: Safe and Scary Kitchen Hacks Sony Daily Edition Reader: 3G, 7-Inch Touchscreen in December Gizmodo Messages --&gt; Login Nas Buffalo's New NAS   RAID-5   Box is iPhone Compatible Too By Kit Eaton , 4:27 AM on Wed Sep 3 2008, 5,646 views Slurp) . Copy this whole post to another site select site advertising consumerist deadspin defamer fleshbot gay fleshbot gawker gizmodo idolator io9 jalopnik jezebel kotaku lifehacker valleywag artists gawkershop sploid . Buffalo has come up a new network accessible storage system which not only hangs onto up to 4TB of your files but]]></description>
<link>http://gizmodo.com/5044707/buffalos-new-nas-raid+5-box-is-iphone-compatible-too</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gizmodo.com/5044707/buffalos-new-nas-raid+5-box-is-iphone-compatible-too</guid>
<pubDate> Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>   RAID-5    configuration</title>
<description><![CDATA[I have installed four hard disks of 146 GB using   RAID-5   (auto configuration) on an HP server DL380. On the disk space, it shows a total of only three disks. Is the problem that the other one has been made a spare? Could you please clarify how   RAID-5   utilizes the one that is not showing? Select... Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada]]></description>
<link>http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/expert/KnowledgebaseAnswer/0,289625,sid5_gci1253774,00.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/expert/KnowledgebaseAnswer/0,289625,sid5_gci1253774,00.html</guid>
<pubDate> Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Linux    RAID-5    Crash Recovery</title>
<description><![CDATA[Linux   RAID-5   Crash Recovery at CFHT Contents UP to LinuxPC page Single Disk Failures Multiple Disk Failures I. Single Disk Failures, Software RAID Warn the appropriate users that you are about to put a lot of stress on their RAID disk and give them the chance to manually copy off critical data before starting reconstruction.. Once the user no longer needs the machine, go into "reconfig" and select "CFHT Maintenance" below the profile, if available. This disables most logins, nfsd, and moves SSH to port 2267.. Check the failed drive's SMART status to see if it really is going bad: . # smartctl -cv /dev/hdx Look for "more than a few" raw counts (last column) of "Reallocated Sectors", and/or "Reallocated Events", or anything else unusual that would indicate the drive really is failing. If the drive looks OK, or you are able to determine that the RAID system ended up removing the drive because of a controller problem or something other than bad media, then skip to step 6.. If the drive is SCSI, or an IDE slave, disconnect the power connector from the drive, reb]]></description>
<link>http://software.cfht.hawaii.edu/linuxpc/RAID_recovery.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://software.cfht.hawaii.edu/linuxpc/RAID_recovery.html</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:26:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Disk size for software    RAID-5    setup? | 1 of 10</title>
<description><![CDATA[Store in Forums all of TechRepublic Discussion - Post 1 of 10 Disk size for software   RAID-5   setup? I'm setting up Server 2003 for dynamic disk and tooling around with mirror/spanned volumes/  raid-5   etc.Heres the thing I know you need at least 3 physical drives for software   RAID-5  .I just purchased a new 80gb drive, and have two other drives to add to the server making 3 hard drives.The two other drives I have are relatively small ; 6 GB and 8GB.Disk for raid:80 GB6GB8GBThe problem is I think in order to create a Raid the OS needs to create an even spanned volume ie :5 GB5 GB5 GBIs this correct?If so Im losing space allowed for my RAID -5, or is 3-5 GB spanned volume   RAID-5   enough? Posted: netforce Job Role: Technical/PC Support Location: san francisco, California Member since: 02/06/2004 View Profile Send Message Sponsored White Papers, Webcasts, and Downl]]></description>
<link>http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=86 =173800 =0</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=86 =173800 =0</guid>
<pubDate> Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Software    RAID-5    in SUSE Linux 10.1 | OpenSUSE Linux Rants</title>
<description><![CDATA[Ya I heard that RAID5 has better performance than RAID1 actually. Anyways, not sure if anyone will respond but I was wondering if I already had an installation on one disk, if it were possible to add 3 more for a RAID5 Software array and mount it to say /data . Would that be possible? Trey Says: January 11th, 2007 at 3:49 pm . Where I work , http://recenter.tamu.edu , we used to use RAID 5. It reads fast but writes slower because it has to parity the information when it s written. Essentially , with 3 x SATA drives in RAID 5 , 1/3 of each drive is on another drive. So if you write something to one]]></description>
<link>http://www.suseblog.com/software-raid-5-in-suse-linux-101</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suseblog.com/software-raid-5-in-suse-linux-101</guid>
<pubDate> Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
